|

- by Alan Adaschik
During his campaign, President Bush promised Hispanic voters that if
re-elected he would “reform” immigration, which means
he would provide three-year work visas for an undetermined number of the
millions of illegal immigrants that presently reside in the United States.
These so called guest workers could then apply for permanent legal status
provided their employers assure government officials that the jobs the
guest workers held could not be filled by Americans.
Labor unions and conservatives oppose the proposed reform because they
believe it would encourage illegal immigration, take jobs away from American
workers, give employers too much say in deciding the fate of the illegal
immigrants, and because it essentially is an amnesty program for undocumented
workers. President Bush declared that he was not swayed or deterred by
these arguments because the only jobs affected will be those that Americans
are unwilling to fill and because his proposal is a worker program, not
an amnesty program. President Bush also maintains that legalizing the
flow of worker immigrants into this country would free up the Border Patrol
and allow them to concentrate on drug smuggling and other security concerns.
First of all, it is acknowledged that there are millions of illegal immigrants
presently in this country. If the Border Patrol is presently preoccupied
with stemming their flow at the expense of addressing drug smuggling or
other security concerns, then they aren’t doing any aspect of their
job very well. The Border Patrol’s primary job is to prevent illegal
entry into our country. You do not enhance one aspect of this job by ignoring
another. The opposite is true, if you improve your performance at interdicting
one kind of illegal interloper, you necessarily improve your performance
at interdicting all kinds of illegal interlopers whatever their reason
for crossing the border. To put this another way, if I were a terrorist
intent upon entering the United States to do mayhem and I knew that illegal
immigrant workers were not being intercepted by the Border Patrol, then
I would enter the country posing as an illegal immigrant worker.
President Bush is also dreadfully wrong when he argues that the only
jobs affected will be those that Americans are unwilling to fill. To be
sure, there are many undesirable jobs in this Nation, but they are undesirable
for two reasons; the nature of the work and the level of associated pay.
Therefore, the problem of unfillable jobs is one more of compensation
than the nature of the work performed and from this, it should be clear
that if the level of pay of any job is raised high enough it will always
be possible to find workers to fill it. This is especially true when so
many people are presently unemployed because of the outsourcing of manufacturing
jobs. The converse is also true. If you have a job where the nature of
the work is acceptable or desirable, the job will become unfillable if
the pay offered is lowered enough. This truth is being ignored by George
Bush.
The real problem with letting illegal workers legally fill jobs is that
employers will be able to offer far less money for existing jobs across
the employment spectrum and this will dissuade Americans from applying
for these jobs thus qualifying them for an illegal immigrant. Therefore,
pay scales for unskilled and semi-skilled work will decline in all sectors
of our economy as more and more jobs are filled by peasant labor willing
to work for lower pay. The end result of this is that to stay employed,
Americans workers will be forced to accept less and less pay for the work
they do until, pay wise, they are on par with the illegal immigrants.
Thus, American workers will inevitably become low paid peasant workers.
Basic economics and the law of supply and demand deem that this is so.
President Bush maintains that his proposal is a worker program and not
an amnesty program. Here again the President uses half-truths and inappropriate
language to make his proposal seem more palatable. First of all, the fundamental
aspect of his proposal is to ignore the illegal status of illegal immigrant
workers. Beyond doubt, this constitutes amnesty for employed illegal immigrants
and future illegal immigrants who find jobs when they get here. As a result,
the number of immigrants who would legally enter this country would depend
strictly upon the wiles of those who are able to illegally come here and
the resourcefulness of businessmen seeking to reduce the cost of their
labor force. Congress, national policy, and the Border Patrol will no
longer be a part of this all important equation.
President Bush is essentially correct when he describes his proposal
as being a “worker program”, but he ignores the fact
that he is not talking about American workers, but instead, foreign workers
who broke our laws to get here. He also fails to clarify that what he
really means by his “foreign worker program” is an
“employer program” that delivers cheap foreign labor to American
businesses at the expense of American workers. Of course, President Bush
could counter these points by pointing out that cheaper labor will mean
cheaper goods and services for American consumers. But by doing so, he
conveniently ignores the fact that American consumers without jobs cannot
afford to buy most goods and services no matter how cheap they are.
In conclusion, the critics of George Bush’s immigration reform
proposal are woefully correct in their concerns. The President’s
proposal is first and foremost an amnesty program for those who broke
the law to get here. Furthermore, his proposal will greatly encourage
illegal immigration and take away a substantial number of jobs from American
workers. However, left unsaid by the proposal’s critics is that
it will also result in lower pay scales and reduced benefit packages for
workers in all sectors of our struggling economy. This being the case,
Bush’s proposal is anything but immigration reform. Instead, it
is an immigration free for all and another example of a President who
cares nothing for the people who pay his salary and one who thinks nothing
of helping outsiders plunder this Nation’s wealth and heritage.
Constitution Forum.us - Copyright © 2008  |